Inicio / Home Blog Página 33

Massive Protest in Brazil over Fare Hike

The clock strikes 5 p.m. It's been raining all day. People are looking for a spot where they can stay dry. There are militarized police everywhere. They've got guns and riot gear. A few youths start to gather in front of the municipal theater in São Paulo, Brazil, just like other generations have done in years past. Their motive is the public transit fare increase—almost $1.50 USD [4 Brazilian Reals] to get on the metro or the bus, which some have to take 4 to 6 times a day.

Massive protest in Sao Paulo, Brazil, over increased cost of public transportation

Leliche Passos is a student who has recently finished middle school. She's joined the demonstration and is giving out pamphlets that claim public transit as a right and not a commodity. "This is the first protest against the fare hike this year and we're not going to stop until they lower the fee. There are workers who come in from the outskirts of the city who can't afford that price every day. We're in a moment of crisis in Brazil and we see that there aren't possibilities for young people or for workers," Passos told Avispa Midia.

A teacher, trained in social service, has also joined the protest with her coworkers. She's part of the "Passe Livre" ["Free Fare"] movement and claims that the cost of transit has been increasing year after year: "The price keeps going up and with it, an increasing number of people are excluded from transport. So people from the outskirts of the city only ride transit to go to work; it's not possible for them to get around the city to do anything else," states the teacher, who introduced herself only as Davita.

See also---> The US Southern Command’s Silent Occupation of the Amazon

She claims that the price increase is part of a package of political and economic reforms that are bringing about a severe crisis in Brazil. "Along with this we have the labor and retirement reform, which is going to lead to an increase in the cost of living. It's all part of the orientation of the capitalist class in our country, which follows transnational economic agreements," said Ms. Davita.

Massive protest in Sao Paulo, Brazil, over increased cost of public transportation

Effectively, Brazil has committed to improving and expanding its public transit system through 2030. It's objective number 11.2 of the UN's 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, which came in with vigor on January 1, 2016. Among other things, the Brazilian government has promised to "provide access to safe and sustainable transport systems at prices that are affordable for all." But in São Paulo, the 10th richest city in the world, where people can travel in helicopter air taxis, there are also people who aren't able to move between different points of this huge metropolis.

"It's a means of social control; this way it's impossible for poor people to leave the periphery. It's a border that's established with purchasing power. It's the same thing for all services. Only those who can pay have access, and if you can't, you're left out", adds Davita.

The UN's 2030 Agenda consists of 17 objectives and 169 goals that address labor systems, security, industry, energy, and health, among other services that are being politically and economically re-calibrated towards privatization and outsourcing.

Criminalization

The number of militarized police who are present cordoning off the fare hike protest is incredible. Some of them are covering their guns as though wanting to draw them against the threat of the crowd, although none of the demonstrators are carrying anything dangerous, apart from some symbolic shields.

"We're living through a dire crisis of institutional and democratic politics in this country. There's no longer any credibility in the institutions. They respond to the demands of the people with repression and criminalization," asserts Davita.

A mask covers the face of the young anarchist, age 16 or so. He prefers not to mention his name, stating that the State has developed an intelligence system that has begun to map possible protest organizers. "In every demonstration there are police recording and focusing on certain faces. Then they go to social media to look for political links. The information is filed away to be used at some point to criminalize and justify repression, because the protests are going to continue to get bigger," says the young man.

"It's a crisis of capitalism itself and today it's more necessary than ever before to think of new forms of organization. We need to look to the rest of Latin America for inspiration, like the indigenous movements in Mexico and Bolivia," shares Ms. Davita.

In spite of the diverse protests carried out year after year by students and teachers, the government has increased the cost of transit using several strategies, such as "approving this increase on holidays, when no one works. Or when there's a soccer match. This is absurd; we as a movement have to learn to be more firm and radical in our actions. This society has to learn to disobey the norms that harm everyone in their daily lives. We need to be smarter in our political actions," adds the young anarchist.

This first mobilization was a relatively peaceful protest. The demonstrators didn't cause any damage to the private property of third parties. The only action they attempted was hopping the metro turnstiles, for which the police decided to unleash the fury and power of their anti-riot weapons on the protesters. The metro's internal security, some uniformed and others in civilian clothes, also used over the top violence against the young people who tried to enter without paying.

Meanwhile, the Passe Livre movement already has several mobilizations planned for the rest of January in other cities in Brazil. In São Paulo the demonstration brought out at least 10,000 people, and double that number are expected for the next protest.

Mexico: Real estate sector robs Zapotecs of their communal lands on the coast of Oaxaca

Overnight, the authorities responsible for carrying out justice in the area of agrarian rights in Mexico ignored the legal recognition of the communal lands of more than 70 indigenous Zapotec families on the coast of Oaxaca. At least one arrest warrant for each head of household has been issued, under the argument that they have stolen the land of two supposed small property owners. The region's lands have been allocated for the construction of luxury tourist complexes.

Tilzapote is in the Municipality of Santa María Tonameca, District of Pochutla, Oaxaca. It has less than 300 inhabitants, who live off of the cultivation of corn, beans, peanuts, melon, watermelon, and hibiscus, as well as fishing. Their lands are communal and include deeds dating back to 1870. They're also backed up by a resolution on the recognition and titling of communal lands in the town of San Francisco Cozoaltepec, located in the Municipality of Santa María Tonameca. This credits the Zapotecs as the legal, legitimate owners of these lands.

However, in 2008, two supposed owners of 300 hectares [741 acres]—Pedro Martínez Araiza and Domitila Guzmán Olivera—appeared out of nowhere. Strangely enough, no one in the community knows them.

"There are documents that date back to the time of the viceroyalty [translator's note: historical period from 1535-1821] that give the community the right to the communal holdings of San Francisco Cozoaltepec. When the Ministry of Agrarian Reform incorporated these documents, which came from a presidential resolution, the Zapotecs got a 29,000 hectare [72,000 acre] plot. The supposed owners refute this presidential resolution, alleging that they hold private property enclosed within the communal lands of Cozoaltepec, specifically in Tilzapote. A surface area of 300 hectares [741 acres]",

BEATRIZ RAMÍREZ HERNÁNDEZ TOLD AVISPA MIDIA. SHE IS A PRIVATE ATTORNEY WHO HAS GIVEN LEGAL COUNSEL TO THE INHABITANTS OF THIS COMMUNITY.
See also ⇒ Oaxaca: Plans for New, Enlarged Military Base on Communal Lands

This year, the Agrarian Court ruled in favor of the supposed owners. The community found out from someone who introduced himself as Cruz Amador Martínez, sent by the Ministry of Agrarian, Territorial, and Urban Development (SEDATU). He notified them that beginning in October of this year, the clock would start ticking for them to move out of their houses. In exchange, he offered them relocation onto 10x30 meter [33x99 foot] lots. He also stated that if it became necessary, the state would turn to security forces. The residents of Tilzapote claim that there has been influence peddling and that politicians who have held federal government positions, like "Héctor Pablo Ramírez Puga, two-time federal representative, Gerardo Estrada, and Alfredo Ramírez Gómez, agrarian subdelegate", have helped this process along.

"Tilzapote is considered one of Oaxaca's most precious beaches, in the possession of Zapotec farmers. It's the beauty of these beaches that has stirred up the greed of petty tyrants and individuals who are looking to take over these lands to build tourist parks", Tilzapote's lawyer Abram Cruz García told Avispa Midia. He has also served as spokesman of the journalists' association of Oaxaca.

Dispossession of communal lands has become common in this southern Mexican state. These lands are an obstacle to foreign direct investment, but also to small and medium investment flows. Interests around industrial and tourist corridors have drastically increased the change in land use. At first, they try to convince or buy off local, traditional authorities, then they try to purchase influence, and finally, there is forced displacement.

"These injustices are the daily bread of life in Oaxaca. All over the state, indigenous people are stripped of their land, and the respective authorities are involved in it, because they are accomplices to these abuses and injustices that have spilled so much blood in the region. They're using every single legal instrument to carry out this dispossession", added Cruz.

Agrarian Court

On December 8, 2017, residents of Tilzapote traveled towards the city of Oaxaca with banners denouncing the land grab. The objective was to participate in a public hearing in the Agrarian Court, where the legal representative of the supposed owners of the 300 hectares also appeared. In the end, the corresponding authorities didn't show up and the hearing didn't take place. "Now we have to wait for the resolution of two injunctions. One that the supposed owners of these properties filed, demanding that the decision be executed and as such, the removal of the inhabitants of Tilzapote. Another injunction on the part of the defense of the inhabitants of Tilzapote, where they demand that the documents dating back to the viceroyalty be respected", stated Tequio Jurídico, an organization that has accompanied the community members in their case.

Underdevelopment in the South

María Luisa Santos Martínez is a woman of more than 70 years of age who has lived her whole life in Tilzapote. She is the living memory of this community that she knows like the palm of her hand. It's almost certain that the supposed owners of this land don't know even a millimeter of what she holds in her memories. She's a grandmother of great courage, known for being fierce and tough in the defense of her ancestral territory.

Together with other members of her community, she was arrested in 2011, accused of aggravated land theft. She told Avispa Midia that "at first there was neither water nor a road in her community", but today, they find themselves right next to one of the major coastal highways, number 200, through which a great quantity of tourists drive. "Everything started with that fucking highway. Lots of people from other places showed up like vultures wanting to buy our land. We don't ask for anything from the government and they come to take away the little that we have. They talk about progress and jobs, but those are pure lies. We want our land", says María.

Highway 200 is part of the Development Strategy of Southern Mexico, launched in 2015 by the President of Mexico, Enrique Peña Nieto. Under this strategy they announced a 450 million peso [$24 million USD] investment to propel the development of Chiapas, Guerrero, and Oaxaca. In these states the proposal is to set up a skilled labor force in the agro-industrial and tourism sectors, allocating a 127 million peso [$7 million USD] investment to grant training fellowships to 35,000 people, especially youth, who would specialize in hotel and restaurant work. A series of reforms, among them change in land use, was established to permit the investment.

Under article 41 of the Reform to the Organic Law of Federal Public Administration published on January 2, 2013 in the Official Journal of the Federation, the SEDATU, who gave the order to evict the inhabitants of Tilzapote, is responsible for handling—among other matters—the following:

  1. In coordination with state and municipal authorities, to drive national territorial planning and structuring that harmonizes, among other things, the utilization of the productive advantages of diverse regions of the country;
  2. To elaborate regional and special programs of the federal executive branch's choosing;
  3. To promote the construction of infrastructure and equipment for regional development;
  4. To plan, design, promote, support, and evaluate financial mechanisms for regional development;
  5. To project and coordinate regional development planning, with the participation of the governments of federative and municipal bodies.

"The underdevelopment of the South/Southeast in terms of economic growth and human progress is recognized, and we seek to integrate the states involved into national and global development. The nature of the indicated actions clearly shows that there is a strategy in mind whose core is economic development",

READS THE DOCUMENT FOR THE PROJECTED 2014-2018 STRATEGY.

Ramírez claims that there are already rumors of "a very large tourism and hotel construction project" in the area of Tilzapote's beaches.

One example of the construction of these complexes is the already underway Conjunto Hornitos project, which will be built on the coast of Santa María Tonameca. It will consist of 14 luxury houses, a beach club, administrative offices, convenience stores, guardhouses, and a water treatment plant. The complex will cover 2.17 hectares [5.36 acres]. It's an example of how real estate speculation has begun to move forward in the region. There's no doubt that at some point, the land grabs will get worse.

Resistance

Recently, on December 6, agrarian authorities and representatives of various communities from the Coast, the Isthmus of Tehuantepec, the Southern Sierra, and the Central Valleys of Oaxaca, as well as the nonprofit Tequio Jurídico, met in the community of Morro Mazatán, municipality of Santo Domingo Mazatán for the "Regional Encounter for the Defense of Our Territories". It was a space for sharing information and organization, "for defense in the face of megaprojects and extractive projects, among them mining and Special Economic Zones", states the encounter's declaration. The community of Tilzapote participated as well.

Meanwhile, on December 8 the residents of Tilzapote carried out a mobilization on the coast, from the community of Santa María el Tule all the way to Tilzapote. "It's an injustice on the part of the Agrarian department and the Unitary Agrarian Tribunal. They were directly involved with a rigged, dirty judgment, where the community of Tilzapote's voice was not heard", said Cruz.

For the Zapotecs, "dialogue has broken" and they have started the process of strengthening their organizing. "I was born here and grew up here 70 years ago. The machines have arrived, threatening to remove us, and they've threatened us many times. We say that we're not going to leave. These are our lands and here we will remain; we are going to fight", said Santos, the elderly woman mentioned above.

"We want the supposed owners to show themselves; we want to know them by their faces. Because here we are fighting for our land, our life. We will go all the way to the final consequences; we are not going to turn over our lands", said Estela Pinacho Venegas, of Tilzapote.

Oaxaca: Plans for New, Enlarged Military Base on Communal Lands

In the beginning of 2017 after an order from the federal government, Alejandro Murat, the governor of Oaxaca, announced that the 28th Military Zone’s campus, today located in the municipality of Santa Lucia del Camino, would be enlarged in terms of infrastructure as well as number of soldiers and relocated to Tlacolula de Matamoros, just 30 kilometers [19 miles] from the city of Oaxaca. This announcement provoked an immediate response from the region’s inhabitants, who made it known that they would not allow the installation of the base.

The donation of 300 hectares [741 acres] of communal lands was initially proposed to the state government for the relocation of this new military complex, although these lands are legally under the responsibility and protection of the community members of this region, where the highest authorities are the community assemblies. The SEDENA (Ministry of National Defense) and the state government first attempted to approach San Mateo Macuilxóchitl, where they were rejected in a general assembly. Afterwards they approached the neighboring community of Teotitlán del Valle, and finally, Tlacolula de Matamoros and Villa de Mitla, where they received the same response from the assemblies.

It seemed that the government and the Ministry of National Defense (SEDENA) had changed their attempt at relocation after the population’s decision by assembly not to accept the base or cede their lands, but what happened was actually a change of strategy.

They hired a real estate company that has been using people from the same community to facilitate individual land purchases. “This time, a company that has refused to provide its name to the owners of these plots has approached them through intermediaries not just to make their offer clear, but to agree on a specific price per square meter—which will be settled between the 20th and 30th of this month, November 2017—without mentioning that these lands will be used to put in the military base”, declared the residents of Tlacolula de Matamoros in a statement published November 13, 2017.

“First they approached asking for copies of the property titles and offering between 150 and 170 pesos [$8 to $9 USD] per square meter. Now a new problem has come up—speculation on land prices. Because they’re offering people a laughable sum, dispossessing them and then increasing the price by five or seven times”,

JAVIER RUIZ, A MEMBER OF THE AUTONOMOUS INVESTIGATION AND ACTION GROUP WHO HAS ACCOMPANIED COMMUNITIES IN THE REGION, TOLD AVISPA MIDIA.

The town’s inhabitants have several concerns over the impacts that the military camp will bring. “Environmental, social, and cultural impacts generated by new housing developments and shopping centers”, they point out in their statement.

In March of this year, Division General Alfonso Duarte Mújica, who holds a Military Staff diploma, confirmed that the SEDENA base, with more than 5,000 soldiers, could trigger economic growth in the neighboring communities. Between the salaries of troops, officers, generals, etc., approximately 25 million pesos [$1.3 million USD] flow through this base monthly: “These resources”, he said, “could be taken advantage of by stores, hotels, restaurants, and transport companies in the area where the new army base is built”.

It seems the government and the SEDENA have been quick to mention the beneficial impacts for these communities, but they haven’t talked about any of the negative effects, which any project is obligated to, no matter the field. “The effects of the population increase in the region will be a shortage of potable water, insufficient garbage collection. And then there are the experiences from other contexts in other Mexican states where the military has established itself and we see a proliferation of the sale of drugs and alcohol, abuse of authority, venereal diseases, bars and brothels”, added a member of the Autonomous Investigation and Action Group.

See also ⇒ The US Southern Commands Silent Occupation of the Amazon

“Faced with all of this, the concerns come with questions about the size of the base, which is comparable to the size of the city of Tlacolula. Why do they need a territory that’s larger than the Salina Cruz refinery, the Tuxtepec brewery, the cement plant in Lagunas or the factories of the Papaloapan Basin [all large industrial projects]?” ask the residents of Tlacolula, who have put out an urgent call to the region’s communities to remain alert to this project’s developments.

Strategic relocation

The concerns of the inhabitants of the Central Valleys of Oaxaca with the base’s installation are in part due to the fact that this base is directly linked with more than 50 mining projects and wind farms that are on the docket for their communities.

“At first we didn’t know why they were insisting on the relocation of the military base, but it’s because of the importance of Highway 190 and the international highway in terms of commodity flows [translator’s note: the state is seeking to build a new international superhighway through the region as part of the Puebla-Panama Plan]. The second matter is what we call the mining corridor, where we have identified 50 mining projects, which run from the community of Totolapan all the way to the village of Lachigoló”, states Ruiz.

Map and infographic of mining concessions and active mines in Tlacolula, Oaxaca.

Oaxaca is one of the states in the Mexican republic where struggle and resistance in defense of communal lands, and the territory as a whole, are on the increase, and this has led to situations where the state has employed extreme violence. “As such, having a military base in the middle of a context of territorial defense makes these communities vulnerable”, maintains Ruiz.

The experience of other communities that have had to deal with the presence of a military base in their territory has made it necessary to self-organize in this region. “At the moment it began, this organization was spontaneous, due to the army’s actions in other parts of the country. There’s a general consensus of distaste and fear towards members of the army. The people are also clear on the fact that the army won’t bring any benefits to the communities; on the contrary, it’s widely known that it will always stand guard so that the investors can freely carry out their extractive endeavors”, says Ruiz.

The Autonomous Investigation and Action Group has taken on an arduous task, in partnership with the communities of the Central Valleys: doing the job that the companies and state and federal governments are responsible for, in terms of the negative effects that the many projects designated for the region will generate. “It’s not just the projects in the Tlacolula Valley; it’s an intrinsic relationship with the wind farms in the Isthmus of Tehuantepec and their transmission lines, as well as the Special Economic Zone that they’re trying to establish in Salina Cruz. These projects are connected and we believe that the presence of the army in our communities is responding to a need to control the population”, charges Ruiz, who is also a resident of the Tlacolula Valley.

Meanwhile, the communities of this region are planning an urgent assembly that will take place in the course of the week. They have made it clear in their statement that, faced with this scenario of possible dispossession and the imposition of an unknown project, they demand “the clarification of this matter from the municipal and state authorities, as well as the rejection of any complex that might affect our territory”.

Click ⇒ here for the complete statement by residents of the valley (in Spanish).

Militarization and “Shock Doctrine” Policies Abound After Earthquake in Mexico

The colored tarps hung over streets and patios of homes awaiting repair have become part of the everyday landscape of the Isthmus communities in Tehuantepec, Oaxaca, in southern Mexico, after the 8.2 magnitude earthquake that hit the country on September 7 causing around 100 deaths. It was the most intense earthquake to strike Mexico in a century. People are still afraid and panicked due to the destruction that the earthquake and its aftershocks have caused. The earth still hasn't settled. Since the initial quake, the Mexican National Seismological Service has estimated more than 6,000 aftershocks, in addition to the subsequent earthquake on September 19 that measured a magnitude of 7.2 and devastated Mexico City and other areas of central Mexico. Three hundred and sixty-nine deaths related to the September 19 earthquake have been accounted for as of October 4.

The Isthmus of Tehuantepec, measuring 20,000 square kilometers, is the region that has been most affected by the September 7 earthquake. Official data presented by the government of Oaxaca show that the earthquake affected 120,000 people in 41 different municipalities, and around 60,600 homes. Of those residences, 20,664 were lost completely, while 39,956 sustained partial damage. Their infrastructure, drinking water and sewage systems are damaged. The local economy has taken a hit. The streets are piled with garbage. Many are concerned that a possible health crisis is at hand.

Public officials have resorted to opportunism, making humanitarian relief conditional -- delivering aid upon certain conditions and to supporters of certain political parties.

It's been more than a month since the earthquake and the communal kitchens and tents set up by neighborhoods in public spaces, through their own resources or through donations from people, have become the only option for these communities. Shelters provided for by the state are almost nonexistent. In the municipality of San Mateo del Mar, for example, where 80 percent of homes were affected, the state response was to send the Navy to set up a shelter, but this meager gesture has been surpassed by the organizing of community members, who have found ways to address their most immediate needs.

Seven civilian organizations carried out a humanitarian aid observation mission among the communities in the Isthmus of Tehuantepec region. In their main conclusions, the organizations noted that "the basic, urgent needs of the people affected by the earthquake [have] not been met; and ... a lack of government coordination can be observed in the distribution of humanitarian aid". They also stated that "pre-candidates and public officials have resorted to opportunism by making humanitarian relief conditional, delivering humanitarian aid upon certain conditions to those who are in some way close to the government or to supporters of certain political parties."

The state's immediate policy in reaction to the earthquake was to demolish local homes that had been affected. In the municipality of Ixtaltepec, for example, residents reported that demolitions began hours after the earthquake. "The earthquake happened around midnight and by dawn the machines were already prepared to begin demolition, without any kind of qualified assessment or evaluation", stated a resident of the municipality who prefers to remain anonymous due to safety concerns.

Indeed, the official response to the disaster was top down and ignored the needs and capabilities of local communities, according to residents and organizers.

"This policy of destruction comes from the federal government, without any serious assessment", said engineer Gerardo de Gyves Ramirez, member of the Regional Council for the Reconstruction of Our Towns, made up of organizations and residents of the Isthmus. "Peña Nieto said it: 'I invited my friends who work in construction to come and rebuild.' Who are Peña Nieto's friends? They aren't the local construction workers or engineers. They are individuals that are connected up top. So, what these companies need is for the territory to be cleared so they can act. It means business for the major construction companies. People are scared, they're in shock, and the government is taking advantage of people's fear".

One of the demands of the Council is that there be a serious study of the residences that were affected and that their condition for reconstruction be realistically evaluated.

The Isthmus of Tehuantepec region is rich in culture and traditions, resulting from the diverse ethnic groups that live in the area -- Zapotecs, Chontales, Huaves, Zoques, Mixes, Mixtecs, Tzotziles and Chinantecs. "The home is a fundamental part of the culture of a community. We have a particular architecture that the people of the Isthmus have developed for centuries", Ramirez said.

The government's response to the housing situation has been paltry at best. For example, President Enrique Peña Nieto announced on October 2 that the government would distribute bank cards for monetary compensation. Those whose homes have suffered irreparable damage will receive $6,478; those whose homes sustained partial damage will receive $1,619. Immediately after this announcement, a line of trailers filled with construction materials made an appearance in the municipality of Juchitán, along with a sign that read, "In this establishment the compensatory card is accepted for the purchase of materials".

There is a pervasive feeling among residents of the community that the government does not value their homes or their lives.

Besides the miserly amount offered for the reconstruction of homes, compared to the homes' value, the way in which the compensation is provided presents difficulties for the diverse communities. In the communities along the coast, for example, where houses are built from palm leaves and wood, they will not be able to replace these materials by purchasing them from the construction supply stores that will accept these compensation cards.

Economic and Military Control

"Seven days after the earthquake, they came to my house and condemned it as being irreparably damaged", said Reina Gutiérrez Ruiz, a resident of the San Mateo del Mar municipality. "They simply said, 'Ma'am find somewhere else where you can stay because you can't live here anymore.' And they demolished the house. A government worker arrived and told us that it wasn't an adequate place to build a home and that the government was going to find another place to relocate our house. So, I [asked] him, how are you going to relocate us if our ancestors always lived here?"

This is a common theme among residents of the community: a pervasive feeling that the government does not value their homes or their lives.

"We can't expect blessings from the government; we're a nuisance to them", said Beatriz Gutierrez Luis, teacher of Indigenous education, member of the Coalition of Oaxacan Teachers for Indigenous Recognition and resident of San Mateo del Mar. "For them, it would have been better if the earthquake had completely done away with our villages".

The teacher's statement is supported by the fact that her village has sustained a fierce fight against mega projects that have been present in the region for at least 15 years. "The government has an interest in the community leaving their land", she said. "Our lands are sought after. Even though we rejected the mega project through a town hall meeting, the government wants to install a wind turbine park on our lands. In the Isthmus there are 1,916 wind turbines already installed, and the government plans a second installment phase. We also know there are mining deals but we won't permit that".

Just as in San Mateo del Mar, historically, the entire Isthmus of Tehuantepec is sought after due to its natural resources. "The ransacking of wood, oil, water, minerals and energy has gone uninterrupted", Luis said.

Additionally, the southern border of Mexico is a high traffic corridor between Central and North America, both for goods and for migrants. For this reason, the region is being considered for neoliberal development plans like the Mesoamerican Integration and Development Project. This is an economic integration project which began in 1999 with policy advice and funding from the World Bank and the Inter-American Development Bank (IDB). It includes all seven Central American countries in the construction of wind turbine parks, highways, oil and gas pipelines, and power lines.

More recently, the Mexican government has established Special Economic Zones (SEZ) in the region. SEZs have specific conditions attached that make them highly attractive to potential investors.

The economic control of the region works in conjunction with the Mexican government's plans for population control, such as the Programa Frontera Sur. With the support of the United States, this plan was designed to regulate the travel of migrants en route toward the United States. With the pretense of fighting drug trafficking, it maintains the presence of several different security forces that facilitate large-scale military control of this strategic zone.

Since the earthquake, these communities are being militarized even further. "There is a clear intent to militarize as much as possible to have control over territory, as well as physical and psychological spaces -- all of it being disguised as humanitarian aid. It's brutal", Luis points out.

According to Jehú Pinacho of the Autonomous Investigation Group, the military -- in addition to providing a means of state control over the territory -- is also complicit with the wind turbine companies.

"An example would be the case of Unión Hidalgo, where members of the community informed [us] that Marine Corps members were hoarding the shipments of donated goods sent by civil society to later allow the wind turbine company EDF to label the goods as their own. Afterwards, EDF was accompanied by the Marine Corps to distribute the goods in the streets of the community",

COMMENTED PINACHO.

The Special Economic Zones

Mexico's government has been expressing interest in the construction of a special economic zone precisely in the Isthmus, and the zone in question encompasses the area affected by the earthquake. Two days after the earthquake, the head of the Federal Authority for the Development of Special Economic Zones, Gerardo Candiani accelerated the process of construction of the SEZ in the region, supposedly to reactivate the economic activity of areas affected by the devastation left by the earthquake.

The truth of the matter is that this construction establishes a zone in which enormous privileges are bestowed upon investors, who, in addition to tax exemptions, will have control of movement and security in the region. The design and plan of the SEZ is led by private consultants with the counsel of the IDB. According to the nonprofit Project on Organization, Development, Education and Research (PODER), this new federal government policy represents solidification of the extractivist model and a step toward the privatization of Mexican territory.

The government's response calls to mind Naomi Klein's concept of the "shock doctrine". In The Shock Doctrine, Klein held that while the economic policies of Nobel laureate Milton Friedman and the Chicago School of Economics have had important impacts on countries with free-market models, it is not because they were popular, but rather because the influence of disasters on social psychology creates commotion and confusion which permits the adoption of unpopular reforms.

"It's a very difficult context for us because the government is using the shock doctrine in our region and taking advantage of the devastation", said Carlos Manso, resident of Unión Hidalgo and author of the book Communality, Indigenous Resistance and Neocolonialism. "People are afraid and more worried about meeting their most immediate needs. While in the midst of surviving this catastrophe and forming bonds amongst ourselves, we also have to find a way to mobilize against the government's larger strategy -- to displace us".

Disaster Opportunism

The context of the disaster has been an opportunity for politicians and business people. On September 29, days after Candiani's declaration, the federal government, without first establishing a protocol that would meet the basic needs of the affected communities in Oaxaca and Chiapas, officially announced the declaration of three Special Economic Zones: the Port of Chiapas, Chiapas; Coatzacoalcos, Veracruz; and Lázaro Cárdenas-La Unión, in the states of Michoacán and Guerrero.

Even though the Isthmus of Tehuantepec has not been declared a SEZ during this first stage, Candiani stated that the project has achieved 90 percent of the prerequisites, like territory acquisitions, for it to be declared an SEZ and that this declaration will be made in the coming months.

Oaxaca is a rural and Indigenous state in which communal land comprises 76 percent of the territory, surpassing the total of private property. This is the principal challenge to implementing the SEZs -- the difficulty of privatizing lands, since they are already in the hands of Indigenous people and rural farmers.

In April, 2017, the municipal council of Salina Cruz, a city that will fall within the SEZ, signed an agreement with the Urban Land Tenure Regulation Commission for the State of Oaxaca, with the aim to "regulate" land tenure in areas designated by the government as "irregular human settlements", transforming these lands into private property, state or municipal assets under the argument that it is "the best response to society's demands".

In May, 2017, one month after signing this agreement and several months before the earthquake, Candiani announced that there were 1,230 hectares of land available as concessions to investors.

US and China Will Benefit

The US and China have powerful interests in the Special Economic Zones. In 2009, the US Agency for International Development (USAID) presented a report titled, "Wind Energy Export Potential from Mexico to the US". This document states that Mexico figures as a potential exporter of wind energy to the states of California and Texas. The two most important wind-generating regions in Mexico are the Isthmus of Tehuantepec and Baja California.

China has also shown investment interest in the SEZs, specifically in the areas of administration, construction, development, management and maintenance. China's interests in the steel, metal, agriculture and information technology industries also make the SEZs particularly attractive for investment.

However, amid the accelerating push for development, resistance persists. Indigenous communities are standing their ground against the SEZs. On August 22, just days before the earthquake, representatives of social organizations from 23 municipalities of the Isthmus region gathered for the national forum, "Extractivism or Life" and agreed to reject the SEZs. In their final agreements, they upheld their opposition to extractivism and to SEZs as industrial models that destroy nature and communal property, while directly affecting the local work force, heirloom seeds like corn, and life sources, such as water and energy.

The US Southern Command’s Silent Occupation of the Amazon

Brazil, Colombia and Peru share a triple borderland separating north from south on the South American continent. Located deep in the Amazon forest, this is the theater of operations in which more than 30 military companies test their services and merchandise. The multinational military exercise known as AmazonLog2017, is organized by the Armed Forces of Brazil. More than 1,500 members of the Brazilian military and military members from invited countries participated with high-caliber weapons and munitions, boats, aircraft, helicopters, information technologies, nautical and energy intelligent equipment, radars and sensors. The Southern Command of the United States -- the Unified Combatant Command of the United States Department of Defense with influence in the Caribbean, Central and South America -- is also an AmazonLog2017 participant.

Activists and researchers are alarmed about this military exercise. According to Mexican economist and geopolitical specialist Ana Esther Ceceña, AmazonLog2017 allows "the placement of troops that facilitate specific territorial incursions and rapid response operations, both of which imply the use of special forces, whether those be US forces, local or private on the triple borderland".

While the exercise involves temporary military drills, many fear that it welcomes larger future operations. According to Ceceña, AmazonLog2017 creates the conditions to allow future military operations of US troops, specifically in two strategic areas: the lower part of Venezuela and along the Atlantic coast, where Brazil will allow the US access to the Alcȃntara military base.

The AmazonLog2017 military actions were planned in three phases. The first, the industry's commercial phase, occurred between August 28 and September 1, 2017, in Manaus, the capital of the state of Amazonas. Two thousand personnel participated in this event, which was comprised of military, government agencies and arms industry corporations.

Between September 26-28, the second phase took place, focusing on ground operations organization. This phase consisted of the Humanitarian Logistics Symposium in conjunction with the Military Employee Materials Exposition and preparatory activities for the triple borderland military drills.

In the third, most important phase, the businesses will exhibit and test their products in jungle-based tactical humanitarian and war drills along the triple borderland with the Multinational Logistics Drill. This phase is scheduled for November 6-13, 2017. More than 1,500 people are expected to participate, including military personnel and arms industry agencies from Brazil, the US and other countries.

"This exercise will bring a series of improvements in the logistics of the western Amazon [...] we are developing a humanitarian aid doctrine of exchange between neighboring countries of interoperability between armed forces and civil agencies",

SAID THEOPHILO GASPAR DE OLIVEIRA, GENERAL OF THE BRAZILIAN ARMY. HE IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE LOGISTICAL COMMAND OF AMAZONLOG2017 AND RECENTLY HEADED THE NEGOTIATIONS BETWEEN BRAZIL AND THE UNITED STATES FOR THE ACQUISITION OF FOUR C-23 SHERPA AIRCRAFT IN JULY 2017.

In order to concentrate the logistical teams, the Brazilian government created conditions for mounting a provisional logistical base in the Tabatinga Municipality in the Amazon State. There, armed forces were concentrated from 16 countries, including Germany, Canada, Chile, the United Kingdom, Japan and Israel, as well as observers from the Inter-American Defense Board, the Conference of American Armies and the Council of South American Defense.

Authorities Tout Aid While Laying Groundwork for Exploitation

Despite its military nature and origins, much of the publicity around the AmazonLog2017 exercises has centered on hypothetical benefits for civilians. In a press conference, General Racine Lima, the coordinator of AmazonLog2017, argued that the army would be focused principally on training to support peace operations and humanitarian aid. Lima mentioned that the upcoming exercises would also support the creation of the Tabatinga Integrated Multinational Logistics Base, which will serve as the provisional base during the military exercises.

AmazonLog2017 organizers took advantage of the military exercise to make infrastructure improvements that permit massive troop movements in remote Amazon locations. Smart energy grids, communication, water purification systems have been installed as well. For example, as part of these drill preparations, $15.8 million was invested in the micro-region of Río Alto Solimões, in the Brazilian state of Amazonas, to create docking terminals.

Behind the humanitarian discourse, it appears that the organizers of AmazonLog2017 chose the theater of operations for this multinational military exercise very strategically, to pursue natural resource extraction that threatens the territories of more than 300 Indigenous communities.

"As Pueblos of the Colombian Amazon, we do not have information about this exercise," said Álvaro Piranga Cruz, a communication adviser for the National Indigenous Organization of Colombia. "But we do know that there are vested interests in all of the Amazon. Interests of petroleum, mining and carbon-trading-based megaprojects. They come to deceive our Pueblos with environmental conservation projects, and we do not know [what] this implies. For example, there are mining agencies that are conducting seismic studies in our territories without anyone's consent."

According to a 2012 report from the Amazonian Network of Georeferenced Socio-Environmental Information, within the larger Amazon region, there are more than 327 plots of land designated for petroleum extraction, comprising 14 percent of the land in the Amazon.

The report notes that the Amazon countries most affected by petroleum extraction are Peru, Colombia, Brazil and Ecuador and further notes that "The mining zones occupy, today, 15% of Natural Protected Areas and 19% of indigenous territories in the Amazon".

"To the Colombian national government, the reality that the Indigenous Pueblos of Colombia live ... is completely unknown", said Piranga Cruz. "There is a law about the Indigenous Pueblos, but in practice, it does not work. For example, Indigenous Pueblos in the Northern Amazon are demanding that these territories be titled as Indigenous territory and the government is not responding to these needs, but it is responding to the needs of megaprojects and smashing our rights".

In February 2017 the Peruvian government announced the Peru-Petro reform based on the three pillars of new contracting models, incentive structures and a national hydrocarbon plan. "This triple strategy seeks to attract investment in both the exploration and exploitation phases of petroleum developments", said Alvaro Ríos, the managing partner of the consulting firm Gas Energy Latin America. "The principal corporate investors are Shell, Chevron, Total and the China National Petroleum Corporation", noted Ríos.

But not everyone in Peru is seeing the benefits promised by the industry. "Petroleum activity has not brought us development; on the contrary, our lands and territory are contaminated and our subsistence resources are as well", argue the Peruvian Quechua, Achuar and Kichwa Pueblos in an October 2017 press release made by Pueblo traditional leaders. These groups have indicated their intent to maintain resistance against oil-based extractivism in the region.

Indigenous Territories in Danger

The Amazon region is composed of 7.4 million square kilometers and inhabited by 33 million people, including 385 Indigenous Pueblos of diverse ethnic backgrounds. Some of these groups have been living in isolation, meaning that for generations, they have maintained themselves deep within the Amazon forest without any outside contact. These areas have been considered inaccessible until now and are of great interest to the Brazilian military.

The Indigenous Missionary Council (CIMI, from its Portuguese acronym) documented the murder of at least 118 Indigenous persons in 2016 and 137 in 2015.

According to data from a 2016 CIMI report, the greatest number of victims lived in the Brazilian Amazon state of Roraima, where there were more than 100 murders of primarily Yanomami Indigenous persons between 2015 through the beginning of 2017.

The governmental organization representing the rights of Indigenous peoples in Brazil, the National Indian Foundation (FUNAI, from its Portuguese acronym), has been a participant in the events of AmazonLog2017. This may seem odd; however, it is less odd when one considers that Franklimberg Ribeiro de Freitas, the current head of FUNAI, previously served as the adviser on institutional relations in the Amazon Military Command.

See also ⇒ Southern Command in Costa Rica: US Occupation Disguised as Humanitarian Aid

Truthout reached out to FUNAI to clarify its role within AmazonLog2017 and the vulnerability of Indigenous peoples in the region, but FUNAI did not respond to comment at the time of publication.

The Brazilian Institute of Environment and Renewable Natural Resources and the Chico Mendes Institute for Biodiversity Conservation participated in the events of AmazonLog2017, serving as mediators between the government and corporations in order to foster the development and incursion of megaprojects in Indigenous territories.

Military Agreement With the United States

As Brazilian society is experiencing economic and political crises, the international military industry is taking advantage of the context of upheaval to test its equipment. Amazonlog2017 is a product of the arms industry and of powerful governments beyond Brazil, particularly the United States.

In 2016, the Brazilian Army signed an exchange agreement with the United States military. This agreement involves cooperation between US ground troops in joint maneuvers in 2017 and 2020. The two armies will end their activities in the United States at the Joint Readiness Training Center in Fort Polk, Louisiana.

Lieutenant Colonel Alexandre Amorim de Andrade, head of the training division at the Jungle Warfare Training Center, affirmed that the US military had begun to train in the Amazon. "Beginning in 2016, there was a specific training focused exclusively on foreigners: The International Practice in Jungle Operations. Now this practice is called the International Seminar of Jungle Operations, and the United States and Peru have confirmed the participation of their military", said Amorim de Andrade.

Although Brazil has not declared war with another country for the last 100 years, its military has participated in UN peacekeeping operations. The current modernization program of the Brazilian Army is geared toward "non-conventional" warfare, including operations against "terrorism".

"Humanitarian Aid" in the South

In 2010, after 30 years without an established military agreement, the US and Brazilian governments signed a military cooperation agreement, but the agreement did not authorize the use of bases or cession of rights of passage for US personnel. However, since President Michel Temer took office in 2016, the US has been given a wider berth in Brazil. The US Southern Command received the green light for more activities in Brazilian territory with the AmazonLog2017 exchange agreements and military exercises.

Before Temer took office, the groundwork was being laid for the Southern Command's presence in the region. In 2013, representatives from the US Embassy and the regional government of Tacna, Peru, inaugurated the Regional Emergency Operations Center. The US government provided $600,000 "to support the Center as part of the Department of Defense Southern Command Humanitarian Assistance Program", according to a press release from the US Embassy in Peru.

The US embassy noted that the Center was just one of the 15 Regional Emergency Operations Centers projected for Peru. The seven already-finished centers are located in Arequipa, Lambayeque, Pucallpa, Junín, Tacna, Tumbes and San Martín. Construction is also planned in Puno, Cuzco, de Huancavelica, La Libertad, Apurímac, Loreto, Ancash and Moquegua. In all, the US will provide more than $20 million for these projects, all part of the Southern Command Humanitarian Assistance Program.

"These Centers respond during times of natural disasters," according to the embassy's press release, and "they allow the integration of a complete range of public services required during an emergency, services like medical and public health services, police, firefighters, and military personnel." However, member organizations of the Campaña Continental América Latina y el Caribe, which promotes regional peace, declared in a press release that "behind these compounds financed by the Southern Command exists a process of regional occupation".

On February 20, 2013, the Southern Command announced it would be opening another Emergency Operations Center, this one in Santa Rosa del Aguaray, in the state of San Pedro, Paraguay. The announcement was made by the director of planning for the Southern Command, George Ballance, after a meeting with Bernardino Soto Estigarribia, Paraguay's defense minister,. These zones created by the Southern Command are in addition to the eight military bases already installed in Colombia.

For Marcelo Cero, a Brazilian sociologist and specialist in international relations, the objective of AmazonLog2017 is not simply to train troops to lead during humanitarian crises; it is to insert the Brazilian Armed Forces in the strategic orbit of the US, which has already taken steps to cooperate with Peru and Colombia. Furthermore, according to Cero, "The participating armies, without a doubt, will put pressure on Venezuela, a regime that opposes US interests in South America".

Meanwhile, in Ana Esther Ceceña's opinion, this military exercise enforces the US military's dominant presence in South America.

"It is Chevron's war, a war of coltan, of uranium, of thorium, of gas, and of gold", Ceceña said. "It is a US war to bolster their material conditions and hegemonic position".

International Labor Organization’s Convention 169 Helps Legalize Land Grabs on Indigenous Territories

Indigenous peoples' territories are some of the few places where natural resources are preserved throughout the world. In fact, they protect about 80 percent of the planet's biodiversity but are legal owners of less than 11 percent of these lands, according to the World Bank. Because of this -- and the fact that so many companies hope to get a piece of these resources -- Indigenous peoples are often in a vulnerable position, and in a permanent kind of war with businesses and governments.

The International Labor Organization's (ILO) Convention 169 on Indigenous and Tribal Peoples' Rights, together with the United Nations 2007 Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, have been the main international legal tools to defend territorial rights. In theory, Convention 169 guarantees Indigenous people residing in the signatory countries the right to their land. To this end, it establishes that for any project that a company or government plans in their territories, they must be guaranteed a free, prior and informed consultation.

Because Convention 169 commits the signatory states to guarantee the integrity of Indigenous peoples, it's been frequently invoked by Indigenous communities and peoples, especially in Latin America, when defending their territories in court. But the Convention has clear limitations that actually jeopardize its intent.

Indeed, the Convention is unprecedented in that it establishes that "all peoples have the right to self-determination." But in several official yet not-so-public statements, the ILO makes clear how far it sees Indigenous rights as going: "One of the concerns expressed in both political and business circles has to do with a misinterpretation of the Convention where the outcome of the consultations could be the vetoing of projects. Said consultations don't imply the right of veto and it's imperative that an agreement or consent be obtained," as stated in the document entitled "ILO Convention 169: Indigenous Peoples and Social Inclusion".

While in many parts of Latin America, Indigenous peoples are defending their struggle for self-determination through consultations, for high-level ILO officials, the mechanism's use is clear. "It's not a 'plebiscite' to obtain a 'yes or no' vote, nor to obtain a 'veto' around decisions with general benefit. It's a dialogue in good faith to enhance the benefits for Indigenous people regardless of the decision (the state) makes," said Carmen Moreno, director of ILO's Latin America regional office during the forum "Situation of the Right to Consultation in Convention 169," which was held in conjunction with the World Bank in Guatemala in April.

In fact, according to the international organization, it's governments that have the last word on Indigenous territories. "The power of the Convention is that it's an instrument through which the peoples concerned can participate freely in a dialogue with the State. But the State, ultimately, is the one who must make a decision", the ILO Convention 169: Indigenous Peoples and Social Inclusion reads. Regarding the most serious cases where peoples must be relocated from their territories, "even in these situations the people have no decision-making power", said Moreno.

In addition, Convention 169 establishes that the rights of Indigenous peoples in relation to natural resources must be protected, but it does not grant them exclusive rights over those resources.

Latin America: Principal Signatory

The Convention was signed in 1989 and went into effect in 1991. To date, 15 of the 22 countries that have ratified it are in Latin America: Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Dominica, Ecuador, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico, Nicaragua, Paraguay, Peru and Venezuela. (In addition to Denmark, Spain, Fiji, Nepal, Norway, the Netherlands and the Central African Republic.)

The significant number of Latin American adherents to the Convention is not a coincidence. It's an attempt to appease the high-intensity conflicts generated by the massive growth of development projects throughout the region. The Latin American Mining Conflict Observatory (OCMAL) points out that over the last decade, Latin America has become one of the epicenters of mining expansion.

"Guaranteeing indigenous people's rights in Latin America: Progress in the past decade and remaining challenges", a report put out by the Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), registered more than 200 conflicts in Latin American Indigenous territories linked to extraction of hydrocarbons and mining from 2010 and 2013.

Térraba: Marked Cards

Carmen Moreno claims that development is the main objective. "The consultations established in Convention 169 are an instrument of good governance to contribute to the development and growth of countries," she said.

However, not everyone the Convention supposedly protects feels included. "They just forgot to ask if our definition of development is the same as their plan for our territories", says Broran tribe member Pablo Sivar, from the Térraba-Boruca Indigenous territory in Costa Rica, who is a part of the Council of Elders. "I definitely don't believe in their type of development".

Sivar and his community are aware of impending threats to their lands and water. "In Térraba, there used to be a lot of water, but not anymore. And they wanna finish off the main river we have, the Térraba River, also known as river Diquís, which in the Boruca language means 'big water'."

He went on to explain that the El Diquís Hydroelectric Project would be the largest hydroelectric plant in Central America, despite official statistics that show that about 99 percent of the country already has electricity. "Who will the Diquís Project favor? Who it will develop? Is it the Térraba Indigenous people? Is it the Indigenous people of the south? Or is it just a few people?"

Work on the Diquís Project began in 2006. After much resistance by the local community, the project was halted in 2011. Without any additional information, the company simply announced -- on the same day the United Nations Special Rapporteur on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples James Anaya visited -- that it would withdraw its machinery and infrastructure from Térraba territory.

Approximately three years later, the government arrived to begin developing a consultation protocol for Indigenous peoples, with the financial cooperation of international organizations, such as the ILO and the United Nations Development Program (UNDP). This was announced at one of the government meetings in Térraba, where Truthout was. "We know why they're here. We know what they want", Pablo Sivar stated.

In the same meeting, the locals wanted to know if the process was linked to the Diquís Project. Immediately, government officials denied any link and tried to change the subject. "This process has nothing to do with the project. We're here to develop a consultation protocol for Indigenous peoples", said Ana Gabriel, Costa Rica's vice minister for political affairs and citizen dialogue.

Government officials aren't transparent about the link between projects and the protocol in these public forums, and make contradictory statements to the media. The plan to build the dam in Broran territory continues. The Indigenous consultation would be the last stage before handing in all necessary documentation to obtain environmental viability and move forward with the project. Feasibility studies and designs are already in place. The construction is scheduled to start in 2018, and operation in 2025.

The attempt to obscure the relationship between the protocol and the project is not in vain. The Indigenous resistance of the hydroelectric dam is longstanding. "We know that everything is ready for them to resume the work," Cindy Broran of the Broran Indigenous Movement, founded by Térraba tribe members to resist the hydroelectric Project, told Truthout. "Consultation is the way to legitimize the company's presence in the territory and with it they'll be able to secure financing from international bodies, such as the World Bank. We know that everything's in place".

Project Halted Due to Lack of Consultation

According to Ana Gabriel, who's responsible for developing the consultation protocol in Costa Rica, the country owes a historic debt to its Indigenous peoples and the current government plans on making up for it. "It's no small matter that the president himself has issued a directive and given a mandate to develop this consultation protocol", she told Truthout.

Despite the politically correct rhetoric of healing and historical debts to Indigenous peoples, the truth is that development projects, funded by international institutions, are unviable because of the lack of consultation. The vice minister of Costa Rica himself admitted it: "There have been projects that have had to be stopped in Indigenous territories due to lack of consultation".

Diquís Project: A Bitter Experience

In 2006, the Diquís Project began in Broran territory with a permit issued by the Development Association, a government entity responsible for land management. "Before we knew it, trucks, cars and people were entering the community," said Broran. "We went to request information and they told us that they had moved forward with it because they had 76 signatures of people affiliated with the Development Association. The association gave the go-ahead for the company to come in and build the dam."

"When the company moved in, it became chaotic," Broran said. "They messed up the whole river, killing many species. Many shops sprang up to sell food, but mostly canteens and bars for workers from outside. The association gave permission for these businesses, without considering that Indigenous law prohibits the sale of alcohol within its territory. The illegal sale of land increased. Health centers and schools ran out of supplies."

Additionally, ancestral patrimony of the Broran people was looted. Between 2006 and 2010, archaeologists contracted by the company did intense work, recounts Broran. They dug three tunnels that still exist. "We learned from folks who worked there that they found many archeological sites, including our ancestors' cemeteries. They took everything they found. They took everything and we don't know where it is".

With Sights on Energy

Since the 1970s, the Costa Rican government has conducted studies to implement a hydroelectric project in the region. "Before, it was called Boruca Hydroelectric Project, which was about 15 km downstream from where the Diquís Project is today, but because of the resistance by the Boruca people, the project was cancelled. So, they moved it higher, in our lands, but it's the same project. It will affect the same river only now on Broran ancestral lands", Cindy Broran said.

According to a study by the World Rainforest Movement, geologists from the company Alcoa (where former US Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill was the CEO between 1987 and 1999) found deposits of bauxite in the General River Valley's subsoil. Bauxite is the prime material used to make aluminum. In 1970, Costa Rica's Legislative Assembly passed a law (No. 4562) saying Alcoa -- one of the three largest aluminum companies in the world and considered a defense company since one of its main clients is the United States armed forces -- could exploit up to 120 million tons of bauxite over 25 years and with a possible 15 years of extension, in exchange for building an aluminum refining plant in the same area.

Aluminum foundries require a great quantity of low-cost electric energy. The project is feasible provided a hydroelectric dam were to be built on the Rio Grande de Térraba, the study said.

The dam project triggered major resistance because many people considered it a violation and dangerous. Large demonstrations and protests took place, forcing Alcoa to give up its project.

Energy for the US

The Costa Rican Electricity Institute (ICE) in charge of the Diquís Project has shifted its objectives. According to the document "National and Transnational Pressures on Energy in Costa Rica", produced by the Association of Popular Initiatives Ditsö, the main reason for resuming construction of the hydroelectric project is the possibility of selling energy abroad, mainly to Mexico and the United States.

The dam is part of the Mesoamerica Project, initially called Puebla-Panama Plan (PPP) and funded by the United States government. It's an initiative which, among other things, includes an extensive network of infrastructure projects from Mexico to Panama "necessary to export -- or better yet, to plunder -- many of our natural resources, whose common destination is the U.S. and Mexico", the document states.

Diquís: Clean Energy?

To date, the Inter-American Development Bank (IDB) has financed feasibility, environmental and social impact studies around the Diquís project. They explained their investment as "contributing to increased energy supply in Costa Rica and Central America, promoting sustainability, efficiency and competitiveness of the region's energy sector, in order to address the impact of CAFTA (a "free trade" agreement between the United States, Central America and the Dominican Republic) in the region, through the implementation of a large-scale clean and renewable energy project".

The Process Is Finalized

The process of developing a consultation protocol was designed by the government to occur in four phases and began in March 2016. Of the 24 Indigenous territories of Costa Rica, 20 agreed to everything up until the last phase, including the people of Térraba. Now, the president must issue an order legitimizing the consultation protocol for Costa Rica.

"We debated a long time over whether or not to participate in this process. We're aware that the government always has political gains in mind", said Broran. "We also know that they manipulate the term 'consultation,' that they're trying to show good faith for public relations. But we want to be there, and say what we think, in front of all Costa Rica."

The Bribri people of Talamanca, a territory in southern Costa Rica, refused to participate in the development of the consultation protocol. "This whole process is a performance," Bribri tribe member Baudillo Salles Sánchez told Truthout. "Protocols and consultations are tools to justify entering and exploiting the territory. They do the consultation as they wish, and then they can say that they're exploiting our resources with our consent."